"Consumers need to see protection as relevant to their own circumstances rather than as a generic financial product that can be dealt with at some undefined point in the future."
- Zara Bray - Quilter Financial Planning
Last week's FCA report into the protection market arrived at a broadly positive conclusion. Competition is working, consumers who hold protection products are generally receiving good outcomes, and there is a wide range of products available across the market.
Yet the report also highlighted something the industry has been discussing for years: despite all of this, large numbers of consumers remain unprotected, and many have never actively considered their protection needs.
One of the realities of working in financial services is that we spend a great deal of time thinking about subjects that occupy very little mental space for most consumers. Protection is a good example. Across the industry, there are constant conversations about underwriting, product design, claims experience, distribution models and regulation.
Advisers, providers and distributors dedicate significant resources to improving customer outcomes. Yet for many consumers, protection remains something that sits firmly on the to-do list.
Part of the difficulty is that protection tends to lack a natural trigger. People actively seek out a mortgage because they want to buy a house. They engage with pension planning as retirement becomes more tangible. They take an interest in savings when they have money they want to put to work.
Protection is different because it asks people to think about events they hope never happen, yet waiting for a health scare to provide the trigger can be too late, as cover may then be more expensive, restricted or unavailable.
The FCA's report references low awareness and limited understanding, particularly among consumers who have never explored protection before. That certainly forms part of the picture. However, advisers will know that consumer behaviour is often more complicated than that. It is not necessarily that people have never heard of life cover or do not understand the concept of protecting themselves financially.
More often, protection is competing against a long list of financial priorities that feel more immediate. Mortgage payments, childcare costs, saving for a deposit, pension contributions and rising household bills tend to win that competition for attention.
That is why the FCA's focus on key life events feels sensible. Buying a home, getting married, becoming a parent or moving into self-employment all create moments when the conversation becomes much easier to have because financial responsibility suddenly feels more real. These are often the points at which people move from abstract concepts to practical questions. The protection discussion becomes relevant because it is connected to something happening in the client's life at that moment.
However, while the need for advice may become clearer, the route to it is often less obvious. In those moments, who does the client turn to, who do they trust and who is front of mind? This is where a trusted and engaged adviser is key, building a relationship before the need becomes urgent and ensuring protection is part of the conversation when those important life events arise.
It is also noticeable that the FCA has chosen not to extend targeted support into protection at this stage. There is not an advice gap here that targeted support needs to fill. The more fundamental gap is between consumers' actual protection needs and their perception of those needs, which can remain low until a life event makes the risk feel immediate.
READ MORE: Income Protection Task Force sets out changes for 2027
The challenge is therefore not simply helping consumers navigate products once they are engaged but prompting them to recognise the relevance of protection in the first place. That feels broadly consistent with what advisers experience day to day. Most protection conversations that end well do not begin with a discussion about products. They emerge from wider conversations about clients' circumstances, future plans and financial commitments.
In many ways, that reflects a broader shift that has been taking place across advice for some time. Protection increasingly sits alongside discussions about mortgages, savings, retirement planning and, in some cases, inheritance tax and estate planning.
Clients rarely think about those areas separately, and advisers increasingly cannot afford to either. Recent interest in whole-of-life policies as part of inheritance tax planning is a good example of how protection conversations are beginning to overlap with wider financial planning considerations rather than existing in isolation.
The FCA's report contains a range of proposals aimed at narrowing the protection gap and improving consumer engagement. Whether those initiatives succeed will ultimately depend on something that sits beyond regulation, products or process improvements. Consumers need to see protection as relevant to their own circumstances rather than as a generic financial product that can be dealt with at some undefined point in the future.
That has always been where advisers add value. The role is not simply to explain products, but to help clients understand the financial consequences of life events and to signpost those risks earlier so that protection becomes a proactive choice to secure financial resilience over a lifetime.
